Skip to content

Gender and the Research Workforce

Back to home page

SECTION 2: Gender and the Research Workforce

  • Print
  • Email
  • Email
  • Twitter

Gender snapshot in ERA

Gender data was collected for the first time in the ERA 2015 evaluation round. This section is an analysis of gender data from ERA 2015 and 2018, and relates to headcount only.

In line with the Australian Government Guidelines on the Recognition of Sex and Gender, institutions must provide the gender of each eligible researcher as either 'male', 'female', or 'X (indeterminate/intersex/unspecified)'. Gender data was used for aggregate reporting and analysis purposes only. This data was not made available to peer reviewers or Research Evaluation Committees (RECs) and did not form part of the evaluation process.

The total number of staff by headcount reported to ERA 2018 was 76,261 researchers. The majority of the researchers were males which made up 56 per cent (42,981 researchers) compared to females which made up 44 per cent (33,240 researchers) and the remaining reported as ‘X’ 0.05 per cent (40 researchers). The number of male researchers increased by 11 per cent from 38,598 in ERA 2015 to 42,981 in ERA 2018, while female researchers increased by 15 per cent at the same period. With this change the proportion of female researchers in the workforce increased from 43 per cent (ERA 2015) to 44 per cent (ERA 2018).

The charts below show the number and proportion of staff by headcount and gender in ERA 2015 and ERA 2018.


Researchers by gender in ERA 2015 and ERA 2018 (headcount)

Bar graph displaying the staffing profile of headcount by gender in ERA 2015 and ERA 2018. The headcount of male was highest in both rounds and increased from 38,598 in 2015 to 42,981 in 2018. The headcount of female increased from 28,880 in 2015 to 33,240 in 2018.

Note: 40 staff were reported as 'X' in 2018, and 101 in 2015. These do not appear on the chart due to the scale.

Proportion of male and female researchers in ERA 2015 and ERA 2018

Donut graph displaying the percentage of male and female researchers in ERA 2015 and ERA 2018. There was one per cent increase of females from 43 per cent to 44 per cent in 2018. The percentage of males decreased by one per cent but was still higher at 56 per cent in 2018.

Note: 40 staff were reported as 'X' in 2018, and 101 in 2015. These do not appear on the chart due to the scale.

Gender by Fields of Research

While the ratio of men and women in the research workforce is 56:44 in ERA 2018 as shown in the chart above, the proportion of male and female researchers varies greatly from discipline to discipline. As the next chart shows, there was a greater share of female researchers in five FoRs out of the 22—ranging from 52 per cent in Medical and Health Sciences to 65 per cent in Education. On the other hand, there were 17 FoRs with a higher proportion of male researchers.

Gender by two-digit Fields of Research, ordered by disciplines with more female than male researchers

100 per cent stacked bar graph displaying the percentage of gender by two-digit Fields of Research codes, ordered by disciplines with more female than male researchers. The discipline with the most female researchers was 13 Education at 65 per cent. Both 09 Engineering and 02 Physical Sciences had the least female researchers at 19 per cent each.

Note: 40 staff were reported as 'X' in 2018, and 101 in 2015. These do not appear on the chart due to the scale.

Although only a smaller number of FoRs had more female researchers than male, the proportion of female researchers has increased in most fields since ERA 2015, as shown in the chart below. This was a result of more female researchers entering into the workforce than male. The female workforce increased by 15 per cent from 28,888 (ERA 2015) to 33,240 (ERA 2018) compared with 11 per cent for males (from 38,598 to 42,981).

Nineteen fields had a percentage increase in the female workforce, although this increase was very small in some FoRs. On the other hand, there were only three FoRs—Technology (-2.6 per cent), Biological Sciences (-0.2 per cent) and History and Archaeology (-0.1 per cent)—which saw a decrease.


Percentage of female researchers by two-digit FoR codes in ERA 2015 and ERA 2018, ordered by highest to lowest in ERA 2018

Bar graph displaying the percentage of female researchers by two-digit Fields of Research codes in ERA 2015 and ERA 2018, ordered by highest to lowest in ERA 2018. The Field of Research with the highest percentage of females was 13 Education and the lowest percentage was in 02 Physical Sciences.

Note: 40 staff were reported as 'X' in 2018, and 101 in 2015. These do not appear on the chart due to the scale.

Gender by Employment Level

The following charts show the research workforce (headcount) by gender and include the employment levels collected in ERA 2018 which include Levels A-E, Non-Academic and Other:

  • Level A—Tutor/Associate Lecturer
  • Level B—Lecturer
  • Level C—Senior Lecturer
  • Level D—Reader/Associate Professor
  • Level E—Professor
  • Non-Academic—senior executives and Higher Education Workers (levels 1–10)
  • Other—Vice-Chancellor and Deputy Vice-Chancellor.

The charts show the number and proportion of researchers (headcount) in each employment level by gender. There are more female researchers in Level B (52 per cent) and those classified as Non-Academic positions (60 per cent). In all other levels, particularly at higher academic levels and in the 'other' category there is a much smaller percentage of females.


Number of researchers by Employment Level and gender (headcount)

Bar graph displaying employment level and gender workforce trends by headcount. Level B and Non-Academic were the two levels with a higher headcount of females. The headcount of females were lower in Levels A, C, D and E. The difference between male and females was greatest in Level E where there were 9,043 males and 3,048 females. The accompanying table contains the data in this chart.

Note: 40 staff were reported as 'X' in 2018. These do not appear on the chart due to the scale.

Proportion of researchers by Employment Level and gender (headcount)

Bar graph displaying percentage of researchers by employment level and gender. Non-Academic had the highest percentage of females at 60 per cent. Level E had the highest percentage of males at almost 75 per cent.

Note: 40 staff were reported as 'X' in 2018. These do not appear on the chart due to the scale.

Gender by Employment Status

Each eligible researcher in the ERA evaluation is assigned to one of three categories for employment status: employed on a full-time or fractional full-time basis, employed on a casual basis, or other employed (e.g. unpaid, visiting, seconded, or exchange staff members).

The charts show the number and proportion of researchers (headcount) by employment status and gender in ERA 2015 and 2018. In terms of the employment status, there are more male researchers than female researchers in each of the three categories. However, compared with the ERA 2015, the percentage of female has increased in all of the three categories in ERA 2018. The largest growth in the proportion of female researchers is in the ‘other employed’ category (e.g. unpaid or visiting)—from 33 per cent to 36 per cent. In this category, the number of male researchers grew by 46 per cent (from 9,306 to 13,559) while at the same time female researchers grew by 66 per cent (from 4,533 to 7,538).


Number of researchers by Employment Status, gender and ERA round (headcount)

Note: * Employed on a full-time or fractional full-time basis.
** The term 'other' status in 2015 has been replaced with 'other employed' in 2018.

Bar graph displaying employment status by headcount and gender in terms of number of researchers in ERA 2015 and ERA 2018. The number of male and female ‘Employed’ and ‘Other Employed’ researchers increased while it stayed about the same for researchers ‘Employed on a Casual Basis’. In both rounds, the number of males was higher than that of females for each employment status.

Note: * Employed on a full-time or fractional full-time basis.
** The term 'other' status in 2015 has been replaced with 'other employed' in 2018.
Forty staff were reported as 'X' in 2018, and 101 in 2015. These do not appear on the chart due to the scale.

Proportion of researchers by Employment Status, gender and ERA round (headcount)

Bar graph displaying employment status trends by headcount and gender in terms of percentage of researchers in ERA 2015 and ERA 2018. There was not much change between rounds in the percentage of males and females in each status.

Note: * Employed on a full-time or fractional full-time basis.
** The term 'other' status in 2015 has been replaced with 'other employed' in 2018.
Forty staff were reported as 'X' in 2018, and 101 in 2015. These do not appear on the chart due to the scale.

Gender by Employment Function

This section looks at the workforce data in terms of the employment function: 'research only', 'teaching and research', or 'other function'.

The first chart and table show the headcount of all staff submitted to ERA 2015 and 2018 by institutions with a breakdown by the employment function and gender. The second chart shows the percentage distribution for apportioned headcount of all staff by employment function and gender.

In all three categories, there are more male than female researchers. Since ERA 2015, the proportion of female researchers slightly increased in 'teaching and research', and in 'other' function categories, but decreased in the 'research only' category.


Number of researchers by Employment Function, gender and ERA round (headcount)

Bar graph displaying headcount staffing profile by employment function and gender in terms of the number of researchers in ERA 2015 and ERA 2018. The number of males and females for each function increased in ERA 2018. The number of male researchers was higher for all functions, particularly in 2018 in ‘Teaching and Research’ where it was 19,329 compared to 16,663 female researchers. The accompanying table contains the data in this chart.

Note: 40 staff were reported as 'X' in 2018, and 101 in 2015. These do not appear on the chart due to the scale.

Proportion of researchers by Employment Function, gender and ERA round (headcount)

Bar graph displaying headcount staffing profile by employment function and gender in terms of the percentage of researchers. There was not much change between rounds in the percentage of males and females. The percentage of males is higher in each of the three employment functions ranging between 54 and 59 per cent while females are between 41 and 43 per cent in both ERA rounds.

Note: 40 staff were reported as 'X' in 2018, and 101 in 2015. These do not appear on the chart due to the scale.

Four-digit FoR codes where headcount of female researchers exceeds male researchers

This gender chart identifies the Fields of Research codes that have more female than male researchers. Out of possible 157 codes there are 35 FoRs where more than half of the researchers are female. The total number of researchers included in these FoR codes is 23,223.8, with 14,310.8 female researchers and 8,903.3 male researchers. Of these 35, the FoR codes with largest number of female researchers are 1117 Public Health and Health Services with 2,981.1 or 61 per cent female researchers from the total of 4,847.9 researchers followed by 1701 Psychology with 1,307.4 or 59 per cent female researchers from the total of 2,228.5 researchers. (Note: there are also 9.7 researchers in these FoR groups who identified their gender as 'X' that are excluded from the following three charts).

Four-digit FoRs with a greater number of female than male researchers

Pyramid bar graph displaying Four-digit Fields of Research with more female than male researchers. The Field of Research with the most females is 1117 Public Health and Health Services and the one with the lowest of the list was 1802 Maori Law.

The following chart shows the headcount of staff—23,223.8 researchers in the FoR codes that have greater number of female researchers—by employment level. The number of female researchers are greater in all categories from Level A to 'other' level with the exception of Level E, where the number of female researchers drops below the number of male researchers.


Headcount of staff by Employment Level (in FoRs with females > males) 

Pyramid bar graph displaying headcount of staff by employment level in Fields of Research with more female than male researchers. Level B had the most females at over 4,000. Other was the level that had the least amount of researchers.

The data for the same group of researchers can also be examined by their Employment Status. The chart shows that there are more female researchers in the full-time or fractional full-time group than the number of researchers employed in a casual capacity. The 'other employed' status includes visiting fellows, exchange, seconded and unpaid staff.


Headcount of staff by Employment Status (in FoRs with females > males)

Pyramid bar graph displaying the headcount of staff by employment status in Fields of Research with more female than male researchers. The status with the most females was ‘Employed in the full-time or fractional full-time group’ at 10,000 female researchers. ‘Employed on a Casual Basis’ was the status with the least females at less than about 2,000.

* Employed on a full-time or fractional full-time basis.
© 2019 Australian Research Council, All Rights Reserved, ABN 35 201 451 156
DisclaimerContact Us
Gender and the Research Workforce

Contents

  • HomeReport InformationGuide to the Report
  •  INTRODUCTION

     INTRODUCTION

    • Background
    • Objectives of ERA
    • Definition of Research
    • Fields of Research (FoR) Codes
    • ERA 2018 Reference Periods
    • ERA 2018 Evaluation Process
    • ERA 2018 Indicators
    • Unit of Evaluation (UoE)
    • ERA Rating Scale
    • Key ERA 2018 Documents
  • SECTION 1:Research Workforce

    SECTION 1:Research Workforce

    • Introduction
    • Changes in Research Workforce
    • Employment Status by Headcount
    • Employment Function by Headcount
  • SECTION 2:Gender and the Research Workforce

    SECTION 2:Gender and the Research Workforce

    • Gender snapshot in ERA
    • Gender by Fields of Research
    • Gender by Employment Level
    • Gender by Employment Status
    • Gender by Employment Function
    • Four-digit FoR codes where headcount of female researchers exceeds male researchers
  • SECTION 3:Gender and Staffing Profile by Two-Digit Fields of Research Code

    SECTION 3:Gender and Staffing Profile by Two-Digit Fields of Research Code

    • 01 Mathematical Sciences
    • 02 Physical Sciences
    • 03 Chemical Sciences
    • 04 Earth Sciences
    • 05 Environmental Sciences
    • 06 Biological Sciences
    • 07 Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
    • 08 Information and Computing Sciences
    • 09 Engineering
    • 10 Technology
    • 11 Medical and Health Sciences
    • 12 Built Environment and Design
    • 13 Education
    • 14 Economics
    • 15 Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services
    • 16 Studies in Human Society
    • 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
    • 18 Law and Legal Studies
    • 19 Studies in Creative Arts and Writing
    • 20 Language, Communication and Culture
    • 21 History and Archaeology
    • 22 Philosophy and Religious Studies
  • SECTION 4:Gender and Staffing Profile Data
  • Abbreviations, Glossary and Appendices

    Abbreviations, Glossary and Appendices

    • Abbreviations
    • Glossary
    • Appendix 1—Eligible Institutions
    • Appendix 2—ANZSRC Fields of Research (FoR) Codes