Skip to content

Engagement and Impact Assessment 2018-19

Back to home page
Section 2 | RESEARCH ENGAGEMENT / Engagement Narratives

Public participation (citizen science)

  • Print
  • Email
  • Email
  • Twitter

Many of the narratives outlined projects where researchers were collaborating with public volunteers to expand opportunities for the collection of data as well as disseminating scientific information and findings to the public.

The term that is commonly used for this type of engagement is ‘citizen science’. The Oxford English Dictionary (OED) in June 2014 defined ‘citizen science’ as "scientific work undertaken by members of the general public, often in collaboration with or under the direction of professional scientists and scientific institutions". The aim of citizen science is to help answer real-world problems by the gathering of some form of data by individuals or a community. Citizen science projects involve ordinary people taking part in particular tasks including crowdsourcing, data analysis, and data collection. The universities recognised the benefits of involving members of the public through harnessing the interests or hobbies of groups of individuals. In addition:

  • Community engagement was recognised as being at the core of these type of projects and researchers often engaged a wide range of audiences, including school children, teachers, hobby clubs and environmental agencies.
  • These interested non-professionals provided a ready and willing resource of amateur scientists that were able to contribute to crucial areas of research through carrying out relatively easy tasks.
  • To ensure that the data gathered was useful, these projects needed to be set up after a lot of thought and designed with the ease and context of tasks in mind.
  • The idea was to break down big tasks into understandable components that anyone could perform and the people collecting the data needed to know what they were taking part in and the importance of the data being collected.
  • Common examples of the types of data collected included soil samples, water samples, bird-watching and recording sightings of marine species.
  • Public input was also sourced for research in the Humanities and Social Sciences. For example, amateur animators were sourced to contribute to the production of a music video. Each animator contributed 50 frames.
  • A key method of engaging with the community when recruiting for such projects was through the use of a variety of forms of media including social media, TV and radio.

Citizen science projects also demonstrated that ordinary people were interested in science and were willing to donate their time to contribute to something they saw as meaningful. It proved to be an invaluable engagement tool for researchers when undertaking research and discovery as well as maintaining interest in science within the community.




  • Collaboration with strategic stakeholders
  • Providing specialist resources and services to external stakeholders
© 2019 Australian Research Council, All Rights Reserved, ABN 35 201 451 156
DisclaimerContact Us
Engagement and Impact Assessment 2018-19 National Report

Contents

  • HomeCEO’s ForewordGuide to the ReportReport Information
  •  INTRODUCTION

     INTRODUCTION

    • Background
    • Objectives
    • Definitions
    • Unit of Assessment (UoA)
    • Low Volume Threshold
    • EI 2018 Assessments
    • EI 2018 Reference Periods
    • EI Rating Scales
    • Assessment Panels
    • Key EI 2018 Documents
    • Use of the EI National Report
  • SECTION 1:NATIONAL OVERVIEW

    SECTION 1:NATIONAL OVERVIEW

    • Engagement and Impact Ratings
    • Research Engagement
    • Impact
    • Approach to Impact
    • Units of Assessment
  • SECTION 2:RESEARCH ENGAGEMENT

    SECTION 2:RESEARCH ENGAGEMENT

    • Introduction
    • Engagement Narratives

      SECTION 2:RESEARCH ENGAGEMENT

      Engagement Narratives

      • Collaboration with strategic stakeholders
      • Public participation (citizen science)
      • Providing specialist resources and services to external stakeholders
      • Provision of specialist training or trainee programs
    • Engagement Indicators

      SECTION 2:RESEARCH ENGAGEMENT

      Engagement Indicators

      • Cash support from research end-users (specified HERDC Category 1 and Categories 2, 3(i,ii,iii) and 4)
      • Total HERDC income (specified HERDC Category 1 and Categories 2, 3(i,ii,iii) and 4) per FTE
      • Proportion of specified HERDC Category 1 grants to all HERDC Category 1 grants
      • Research commercialisation income
      • Indicator charts
      • Additional quantitative Indicators
  • SECTION 3:IMPACT AND APPROACH TO IMPACT

    SECTION 3:IMPACT AND APPROACH TO IMPACT

    • Introduction
    • Impact Studies

      SECTION 3:IMPACT AND APPROACH TO IMPACT

      Impact Studies

      • Delivering cutting edge technology with partners
      • Community support and safety
      • Improving everyday life
      • Fostering communities
      • Addressing challenges affecting society
    • Approach to Impact

      SECTION 3:IMPACT AND APPROACH TO IMPACT

      Approach to Impact

      • Support for ongoing collaboration
      • Provision of infrastructure
      • Support mechanisms for knowledge transfer
    • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research

      SECTION 3:IMPACT AND APPROACH TO IMPACT

      Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research

      • Impact—Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research
      • Approach to impact—Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research
    • Impact Studies—Supplementary Information

      SECTION 3:IMPACT AND APPROACH TO IMPACT

      Impact Studies—Supplementary Information

      • Additional FoR codes for impact studies
      • FoR Codes for associated research
      • Socio-Economic Objectives (SEO) codes
      • Australian and New Zealand Standard Industrial Classification (ANZSIC) Codes
      • Science and Research Priorities
      • Countries where impact is occurring
      • Keywords
      • Beneficiaries
      • Additional quantitative indicators
  • SECTION 4:EI 2018 INSTITUTION REPORT

    SECTION 4:EI 2018 INSTITUTION REPORT

    • 01 Mathematical Sciences
    • 02 Physical Sciences
    • 03 Chemical Sciences
    • 04 Earth Sciences
    • 05 Environmental Sciences
    • 06 Biological Sciences
    • 07 Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
    • 08 Information and Computing Sciences
    • 09 Engineering
    • 10 Technology
    • 11 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
    • 11 Public and Allied Health Sciences
    • 12 Built Environment and Design
    • 13 Education
    • 14 Economics
    • 15 Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services
    • 16 Studies in Human Society
    • 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
    • 18 Law and Legal Studies
    • 19 Studies in Creative Arts and Writing
    • 20 Language, Communication and Culture
    • 21 History and Archaeology
    • 22 Philosophy and Religious Studies
    • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research
    • Interdisciplinary
  • Abbreviations and Appendices

    Abbreviations and Appendices

    • Abbreviations
    • Appendix 1—Eligible institutions
    • Appendix 2—Fields of Research (FoR) Codes Used in EI and Assessment Panels
    • Appendix 3—FoR 11 Medical and Health Sciences