Skip to content

Engagement and Impact Assessment 2018-19

Back to home page

CEO’s Foreword

  • Print
  • Email
  • Email
  • Twitter
Picture of ARC Chief Executive Officer Professor Sue Thomas
This Engagement and Impact Assessment 2018-19 National Report presents the outcomes of the inaugural nation-wide assessment of university research engagement and impact (EI 2018).

EI 2018 is an initiative under the Australian Government’s National Innovation and Science Agenda. For the first time it gives Government, universities, research end-users, and the broader public a detailed understanding of how Australia’s universities and their researchers are collaborating with industry, government, communities and the not-for-profit sector. It also represents a national mechanism for understanding how universities are translating their research into economic, environmental, social, cultural and other benefits.

EI 2018 built on the success of a pilot conducted in 2017 and drew on international best-practice including the lessons from comparable exercises such as the United Kingdom’s Research Excellence Framework. As a result, the EI 2018 methodology uses expert review—by researchers and research end-users—of narrative studies and supporting quantitative information. It is a methodology that is robust while at the same time sensitive to the reporting burden of participating universities.

EI 2018 is a retrospective assessment looking at data from 2016 and earlier. With the results released in this report we can gauge university performance in research engagement and impact across all disciplines. Future rounds will allow us to compare this performance over time.

The results from the 626 engagement submissions present rich information about the extensive and diverse ways that Australian universities engage with business, community sectors and Government. Similarly, there are many examples from the 637 impact submissions where university research has led to highly significant impacts beyond the realm of academic research. I am particularly pleased that EI 2018 has been able to report on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander research—through 20 specific impact studies—in a way that has not been available through other evaluation mechanisms.

I encourage the university sector, industry and other research end-users, and those interested members of the public to explore the data presented in this report as well as the 240 highly rated impact studies that are available through the ARC website. The data and the impact studies provide insights into areas of strength across all disciplines. This information demonstrates the impact that research is having—from delivering cutting-edge technologies, supporting communities and their safety, to addressing some of the major challenges affecting society.

Of course, the success of EI 2018 would not have been possible without the support of the 40 participating universities or the 70 researchers and research end-users that conducted the assessments. I would like to express my great appreciation for the extensive work that this has required over the past year and thank them on behalf of the ARC.

Signature of ARC Chief Executive Officer Professor Sue Thomas
Professor Sue Thomas
Chief Executive Officer
Australian Research Council
© 2019 Australian Research Council, All Rights Reserved, ABN 35 201 451 156
DisclaimerContact Us
Engagement and Impact Assessment 2018-19 National Report

Contents

  • HomeCEO’s ForewordGuide to the ReportReport Information
  •  INTRODUCTION

     INTRODUCTION

    • Background
    • Objectives
    • Definitions
    • Unit of Assessment (UoA)
    • Low Volume Threshold
    • EI 2018 Assessments
    • EI 2018 Reference Periods
    • EI Rating Scales
    • Assessment Panels
    • Key EI 2018 Documents
    • Use of the EI National Report
  • SECTION 1:NATIONAL OVERVIEW

    SECTION 1:NATIONAL OVERVIEW

    • Engagement and Impact Ratings
    • Research Engagement
    • Impact
    • Approach to Impact
    • Units of Assessment
  • SECTION 2:RESEARCH ENGAGEMENT

    SECTION 2:RESEARCH ENGAGEMENT

    • Introduction
    • Engagement Narratives

      SECTION 2:RESEARCH ENGAGEMENT

      Engagement Narratives

      • Collaboration with strategic stakeholders
      • Public participation (citizen science)
      • Providing specialist resources and services to external stakeholders
      • Provision of specialist training or trainee programs
    • Engagement Indicators

      SECTION 2:RESEARCH ENGAGEMENT

      Engagement Indicators

      • Cash support from research end-users (specified HERDC Category 1 and Categories 2, 3(i,ii,iii) and 4)
      • Total HERDC income (specified HERDC Category 1 and Categories 2, 3(i,ii,iii) and 4) per FTE
      • Proportion of specified HERDC Category 1 grants to all HERDC Category 1 grants
      • Research commercialisation income
      • Indicator charts
      • Additional quantitative Indicators
  • SECTION 3:IMPACT AND APPROACH TO IMPACT

    SECTION 3:IMPACT AND APPROACH TO IMPACT

    • Introduction
    • Impact Studies

      SECTION 3:IMPACT AND APPROACH TO IMPACT

      Impact Studies

      • Delivering cutting edge technology with partners
      • Community support and safety
      • Improving everyday life
      • Fostering communities
      • Addressing challenges affecting society
    • Approach to Impact

      SECTION 3:IMPACT AND APPROACH TO IMPACT

      Approach to Impact

      • Support for ongoing collaboration
      • Provision of infrastructure
      • Support mechanisms for knowledge transfer
    • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research

      SECTION 3:IMPACT AND APPROACH TO IMPACT

      Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research

      • Impact—Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research
      • Approach to impact—Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research
    • Impact Studies—Supplementary Information

      SECTION 3:IMPACT AND APPROACH TO IMPACT

      Impact Studies—Supplementary Information

      • Additional FoR codes for impact studies
      • FoR Codes for associated research
      • Socio-Economic Objectives (SEO) codes
      • Australian and New Zealand Standard Industrial Classification (ANZSIC) Codes
      • Science and Research Priorities
      • Countries where impact is occurring
      • Keywords
      • Beneficiaries
      • Additional quantitative indicators
  • SECTION 4:EI 2018 INSTITUTION REPORT

    SECTION 4:EI 2018 INSTITUTION REPORT

    • 01 Mathematical Sciences
    • 02 Physical Sciences
    • 03 Chemical Sciences
    • 04 Earth Sciences
    • 05 Environmental Sciences
    • 06 Biological Sciences
    • 07 Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
    • 08 Information and Computing Sciences
    • 09 Engineering
    • 10 Technology
    • 11 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
    • 11 Public and Allied Health Sciences
    • 12 Built Environment and Design
    • 13 Education
    • 14 Economics
    • 15 Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services
    • 16 Studies in Human Society
    • 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
    • 18 Law and Legal Studies
    • 19 Studies in Creative Arts and Writing
    • 20 Language, Communication and Culture
    • 21 History and Archaeology
    • 22 Philosophy and Religious Studies
    • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research
    • Interdisciplinary
  • Abbreviations and Appendices

    Abbreviations and Appendices

    • Abbreviations
    • Appendix 1—Eligible institutions
    • Appendix 2—Fields of Research (FoR) Codes Used in EI and Assessment Panels
    • Appendix 3—FoR 11 Medical and Health Sciences